Lars Bolle
· 14.09.2026
Technical specifications, videos and manufacturer’s information are available online. Initial assessments are spreading across social media, whilst AI summarises existing knowledge in a matter of seconds. That is useful. However, the crucial question remains: how much of this stands up to scrutiny? That is where specialist journalism begins for us.
When YACHT and BOOTE test a new boat, a technical specification sheet is not enough. Our testers drive and sail the boats themselves, inspecting the deck, interior and technical systems. To do so, they travel all over Europe. The feel of the helm, ergonomics and noise levels cannot be assessed from a desk.
The same applies to sailing areas. Anyone can consult a nautical chart and a harbour guide. However, theoretical knowledge of a harbour entrance is quite different from the practical experience of whether it can actually be approached safely in windy conditions. This effort yields unique insights – whether in a boat test, a report on a sailing area, or a profile for which we meet people rather than simply reading a biography.
When it comes to equipment and materials, too, it is not enough simply to rely on the manufacturer’s specifications. Life jackets, chart plotters, ropes, sailing clothing and care products must prove their worth in real-world use. We test their handling, build quality and functionality under conditions that actually occur on board: in wet and cold conditions, whilst the boat is moving, in confined spaces or after prolonged use. Measurements and technical data help with assessment, but they are no substitute for asking whether a product works reliably, is easy to use and justifies its price in everyday sailing.
If a yacht sinks, a boat catches fire or someone falls overboard, images and supposed explanations spread within minutes. That’s when our work really begins: What actually happened? Who can confirm it? What can be deduced from images, location data or official statements?
Sometimes the most honest answer is: ‘We don’t know yet.’ That may be unsatisfactory in the battle for attention. However, a plausible explanation does not become a fact simply because it is widely shared.
For us, an accident is also an opportunity to explain the bigger picture: how can water ingress be detected at an early stage? What mistakes can be avoided? News reports often merely state what has happened. Good specialist journalism offers advice on what readers can learn from it.
No one in an editorial team can be an expert on every subject down to the last detail. That is why we work with designers and other specialists to translate complex concepts into reliable information for water sports enthusiasts.
The same applies to tests. Not every observation constitutes a measured value. Difficult conditions can skew a result. And a fault on a test vessel should not be hastily attributed to an entire model range. Journalistic rigour is also evident in what one chooses not to claim.
That is what ‘Democracy Needs Many Voices’ is all about: doing your own research rather than simply accepting what others say, checking the facts yourself rather than just repeating what you’ve heard, and taking responsibility for what you publish. Of course, a review of a new yacht doesn’t decide a political debate. But the principle is the same as in political newsrooms and local newspapers. We’re simply focused on water sports.
Our readers do not have to agree with our assessment. They are free to think highly of a boat we have criticised, or to steer clear of a sailing area we have recommended. It is not our role to make that decision for them. We aim to research and evaluate matters so thoroughly that you can form your own opinion on a reliable basis.
With this article, YACHT and BOOTE are taking part in the nationwide campaign week “Democracy needs many voices“ from 14 to 19 September 2026. The initiative invites media partners to highlight the importance of reliable information and professional journalism for an informed democratic public.

Chief Editor Digital